Fingerprint Identification Practices among Law Enforcement Agencies: A Mixed Methods Study
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.67669/facci0021Keywords:
Fingerprint identification, PNP, NBI, ACE-V, forensic science, dactyloscopyAbstract
This mixed-method explanatory sequential study was conducted to determine fingerprint identification practices among law enforcement agencies on Panay Island for the calendar year 2024-2025. The respondents for the quantitative part of the study were one hundred (100) purposively selected respondents, composed of ninety (90) PNP Investigators, eight (8) PNP fingerprint experts, and two (2) NBI fingerprint experts, classified according to their length of service and course. For the qualitative part, the participants were eight (8) fingerprint experts from the PNP and two (2) from the NBI. The findings indicated that fingerprint identification practices among law enforcement personnel were moderate in terms of length of service and degree. There was no significant difference in fingerprint identification practices among law enforcement personnel when classified by length of service and degree. Four key themes emerged in the representation of fingerprint identification practices across different law enforcement agencies, namely: use of standardized processes in fingerprint identification, use of the ACE-V method, use of methods and techniques for fingerprint comparison, and conduct of fingerprint verification. The study’s findings guided the development of an enhanced fingerprint identification training program to equip law enforcement personnel with the skills, knowledge, and competencies to improve the accuracy and efficiency of fingerprint identification processes, ensuring consistent application of best practices and enhancing their overall competency in forensic investigations.
Downloads
References
Chen, R., Liu, S., & Wong, T. (2020). Standardized protocols and their impact
on forensic performance in fingerprint identification. Journal of
Police Science and Management, 18(4), 321–338.
Cole, S. (2016). Scandal, fraud, and the reform of forensic science: The case
of fingerprint analysis. West Virginia Law Review, 119(2). https://
researchrepository.wvu.edu/wvlr/vol119/iss2/5
Creswell, J. W., Plano Clark, V. L., Gutmann, M. L., & Hanson, W. E. (2003).
Research design: Qualitative, quantitative, and mixed methods
approaches (2nd ed.). Sage Publications, Inc.
García, J., Santos, M., & Reyes, P. (2018). The impact of professional
development workshops on fingerprint identification skills among
law enforcement officers. Journal of Forensic Science and Practice,
14(2), 123–135.
Rossman, G., & Wilson, B. (1985). Combining quantitative and qualitative
methods in a single large-scale evaluation study. Sage Journals.
https://doi.org/10.1177/0193841X8500900505 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/0193841X8500900505
Smith, A., & Jones, B. (2017). Professional development and forensic science
practices: Bridging the gap in evidence collection. Law Enforcement
Research Journal, 12(4), 89–101.
