Cohesive community in the digital realm: Promotion, platforms, and strategies in crime prevention
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.67669/facci0009Keywords:
digital community cohesion, strategy, safe communities, community-based interventionAbstract
This study explores the role of digital community cohesion in crime prevention within the National Capital Region (NCR) of the Philippines, focusing on how digital platforms, promotional efforts, and online strategies contribute to safer communities. Drawing on both quantitative and qualitative methods, the research engaged 400 respondents aged 21 and above, selected based on statistical validity to ensure representativeness. The study examined perceptions of digital crime prevention efforts and the impact of socio-environmental and personal-emotional factors on digital engagement.
Quantitative results revealed strong public agreement on the usefulness of social media and other digital tools in enhancing crime awareness, real-time reporting, and community mobilization. However, concerns about misinformation and credibility challenges highlight areas for improvement. ANOVA testing showed significant differences in perception across key indicators (F = 9.94, p < 0.001), emphasizing the multifaceted influence of digital platforms on public trust and participation. Qualitative analysis uncovered two dominant themes: Environmental and Social Influences (e.g., peer pressure, community disorganization) and Personal and Emotional Struggles (e.g., abandonment, attention-seeking), which affect individual engagement with digital communities.
The findings suggest that while digital platforms are valuable tools for crime prevention and social cohesion, their effectiveness is moderated by trust,literacy, and emotional well-being. To maximize impact, digital strategies must be coupled with community-based interventions, ethical governance, and support systems addressing the deeper social and psychological factors that influence online behavior. This research provides a foundation for future policymaking and program development in digitally driven crime prevention efforts.
Downloads
References
Agnew, R. (1992). Foundation for a general strain theory of crime and DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1745-9125.1992.tb01093.x
delinquency. Criminology, 30(1), 47–88.
Bandura, A. (1977). Social Learning Theory. Prentice-Hall.
Brutas, K. (n.d.). Social Media and Privacy: The Philippine Experience.
https://fma.ph/resources/resources-gender-ict/social-media-and-
privacy-the-philippine-experience/
Chen, Y., Zhang, Z., & Xu, Q. (2020). Public perception and digital
technology adoption in crime prevention: A comparative study.
Journal of Technology in Society, 61, 101241. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.
techsoc.2020.101241
Creswell, J. W., & Plano Clark, V. L. (2017). Designing and Conducting Mixed
Methods Research (3rd ed.). Sage Publications.
Flick, U. (2018). An Introduction to Qualitative Research (6th ed.). Sage DOI: https://doi.org/10.4135/9781529622737
Publications.
Foster, B. (2023). Exploring community cohesion in the age of digital society: a multidisciplinary study in Wales (Doctoral dissertation, Cardiff University).
George, T. (2021). Mixed Methods Research | Definition, Guide & Examples. https://www.scribbr.com/methodology/mixed-methods-research/
Harris, A., & Johns, A. (2021). Youth, social cohesion and digital life: From
risk and resilience to a global digital citizenship approach. Journal
of Sociology, 57(2), 394-411.
Hook, K., & Verdeja, E. (2022). Social Media Misinformation and the
Prevention of Political Instability and Mass Atrocities. https://
www.stimson.org/2022/social-media-misinformation-and-the-
prevention-of-political-instability-and-mass-atrocities/
Kim, Y., & Hawkins, R. (2020). The Impact of Digital Media on Public Safety
Perception. Journal of Crime and Technology, 12(3), 211-228.
Krejcie, R. V., & Morgan, D. W. (1970). Determining sample size for research DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/001316447003000308
activities. Educational and Psychological Measurement, 30(3), 607-
610.
Laureen Keen. (2024). The Power of Digital Connection: Understanding
the Growing ... https://blog.adrianalacyconsulting.com/digital-
connection-online-communities/
Lee, J., Kim, S., & Park, E. (2020). Digital reporting and community
engagement in public safety: Evidence from urban neighborhoods.
Journal of Community Safety, 15(2), 134–150.
Livingstone, S., & Third, A. (2017). Children and young people’s rights in the digital age: An emerging agenda. New Media & Society, 19(5), 657-
670. https://doi.org/10.1177/1461444816686318 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/1461444816686318
Livingstone, S., Stoilova, M., & Kelly, A. (2017). Children’s data and privacy
online: Growing up in a digital age. London School of Economics
and Political Science.
Mazerolle, L., Antrobus, E., Bennett, S., & Tyler, T. R. (2019). Social media
and police–community relations: A longitudinal study. Policing and
Society, 29(3), 235–255. https://doi.org/10.1080/10439463.2017.1385
526
Meijer, A., & Thaens, M. (2020). Public trust and digital transparency in law enforcement communication. Government Information Quarterly,
37(3), 101472. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.giq.2020.101472
Moffitt, T. E. (1993). Adolescence-limited and life-course-persistent
antisocial behavior: A developmental taxonomy. Psychological
Review, 100(4), 674–701.
Nisha Bangeja. (2025). How Community policing helps to reduce crime with
technology in ... https://vidizmo.ai/blog/how-community-policing-
helps-to-reduce-crime-with-technology-in-2024
Pew Research Center. (2019). Many Americans Say Made-Up News Is a Critical Problem That Needs To Be Fixed. https://www.pewresearch.org
Saunders, M., Lewis, P., & Thornhill, A. (2022). Research methods for business
students (9th ed.). Pearson.
Shaw, C. R., & McKay, H. D. (1942). Juvenile Delinquency and Urban Areas. DOI: https://doi.org/10.2307/1334446
University of Chicago Press.
Taber, K. S. (2018). The use of Cronbach’s Alpha when developing and
reporting research instruments in science education. Research in
Science Education, 48(6), 1273-1296.
Taherdoost, H. (2016). Validity and reliability of the research instrument;
how to test the validation of a questionnaire/survey in a research.
International Journal of Academic Research in Management, 5(3), 28-
FACCI December 2024 9
36. https://papers.ssrn.com/sol3/papers.cfm?abstract_id=3205040
Trottier, D. (2012). Social media as surveillance: Rethinking visibility in a
converging world. Routledge.
United Nations Office on Drugs and Crime (UNODC). (2020). Digital
technologies in crime prevention and criminal justice. Retrieved
from https://www.unodc.org/e4j/en/cybercrime
United Nations Office on Drugs and Crime (UNODC). (2020). E4J University
Module Series on Cybercrime. Retrieved from https://www.unodc.
org/e4j/en/cybercrime
Wang, H., & Sun, Y. (2021). Digital community platforms and social cohesion: Trust and engagement dynamics. Computers in Human Behavior,
120, 106754. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2021.106754 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2021.106754
Walliman, N. (2022). Research methods: The basics (2nd ed.). Routledge. DOI: https://doi.org/10.4324/9781003141693
We Are Social, & Hootsuite. (2024). Digital 2024: The Philippines. Retrieved from https://wearesocial.com/digital-2024-philippines
Zhang, X., & Zhu, H. (2021). Online community engagement and collective
crime prevention: A social cohesion perspective. Journal of Urban
Affairs, 43(4), 584–602. https://doi.org/10.1080/07352166.2020.181
5821
